Boundary Waters Quetico Forum :: Listening Point - General Discussion :: Pictographs
|
Author | Message Text | ||
BasecampMom |
|
||
Grandma L |
On LLC at Irving island - just north of Warrior Hill |
||
Frenchy19 |
|
||
firemedic5586 |
Frenchy19: "To be respectful, please do not take pictures. " Please explain.. |
||
CanoeViking |
I was wondering three things... 1. What tribe(s) created them? 2. What was their source of "paint"? 3. Where would you recommend going to see some good, clear pictographs? Thanks, CV |
||
ellahallely |
|
||
Savage Voyageur |
|
||
dentondoc |
This panel is on Quetico Lake. You'd pass it headed east if you were on the approach to the portage into Kasakokwog Lake. There are a number of other pictographs on Quetico Lake, including this one which is west of the one pictured above. There are a number (something like 8 different sites) on Agnes Lake, including a panel on roughly the same scale as the one on Quetico. Agnes also has the distinction (I believe) of being the only lake also having a petroglyph (west side, north of the portage into Silence Lake). You will find additional panels on Lac La Croix (just north of Bottle Portage), Darkwater (southeast shore of the lake) and other places. However, the best single site I've seen is a panel on Artery Lake on the Bloodvein River a bit east of the Manitoba border. This picture is only a small part of the overall panel. dd |
||
CanoeViking |
Thanks again for sharing the useful info and I think we will be visiting the Hegman Pictos this summer and hopefully a couple others. |
||
Grandma L |
Wait a few hundred years for someone to find the sculpture garden at Loring Park-Art Museum in Minneapolis. What will they think of the "Spoon and Cherry"? |
||
bobbernumber3 |
Grandma L: "...pictographs are not just ancient graffiti? ." Just ancient graffiti? Paint 'em over with modern graffiti should not be an issue then... who cares? Its just older graffitti... |
||
Grandma L |
|
||
firemedic5586 |
|
||
CanoeViking |
Is there any other Indian or Voyaguer sites interesting to visit? |
||
Goldenbadger |
|
||
bobbernumber3 |
firemedic5586: "Frenchy19: "To be respectful, please do not take pictures. " Descendants of the people believed to have created the pictographs believe that a photograph "takes away" some of the original image and thereby harms the pictograph. |
||
bobbernumber3 |
CanoeViking: "I have not had the privilege yet of getting to see any of the pictographs yet. 1) Ojibwa or their Algonkian-speaking ancestors. 2) Rusted iron ore (red ochre) was mixed with a binding agent, possibly bear grease or sturgeon oil. The binder left no film between the pigment and the rock, creating a permanent bond better and longer-lasting than modern paint which would blister or flake with changing temperatures. 3) Pictograph sites in Ontario |
||
Pinetree |
Goldenbadger: "The pictos on the Basswood River are amazing and there are a lot of them. I'm not sure why pictures would be disrespectful. Just don't touch them. Michael Furtman's book is excellent." No expert on this issue at all. But to me,pictures make it available for others to see these past artifacts and maybe appreciate Indian culture and the area if pictures taken? A lot of the pictographs to me show and tell a story of hunting and it is a message to pass on? Also with zero reference on my part,I know various groups of Indian tribes say pictures should not be taken. I just wonder how and when they determined that? There was no cameras back than so no one or group at that time could say pictures would affect the Pictographs in anyway? Like I am saying I have no reference on my part,but wonder how and when they determined it was wrong to photograph? Just wondering? |
||
andym |
Northwoods Memories Multimedia Productions pictograph guides |