Boundary Waters Quetico Forum :: Gear Forum :: Another Solo Canoe Thread - Magic vs NW Solo
|
Author | Message Text | ||
plmn |
A big thank you to all who helped here! |
||
WHendrix |
plmn: "My new to me Magic. First paddle and it is definitely the right choice for me. I don't find it tippy at all. Should be fine with the dog. Was planning on putting a foot brace in but after today I'm not sure I'll need one. I will probably need some foam or something on the gunwales for long paddles as they're uncomfortable on my legs. I think that would be an issue with the NW Solo too. The foot braces would eliminate the need for the foam on the gunwale. I have owned both a Magic and a NW Sole and had/have foot braces on both. I have also had/have a kayak style back braces on both and combined with the foot braces, they make you feel very much attached to the boat. |
||
OMGitsKa |
|
||
timf1981 |
|
||
ducks |
|
||
timf1981 |
plmn: "I've been looking at buying my first solo canoe to complement the family tandem. After way too much research I think I have it narrowed down to a Northstar Magic or NW Solo. I primarily want it to be efficient and seaworthy when tripping and able to keep up with tandems but also plan to be using it empty on a fairly wide and slow river for day paddling. Not planning on any rapids, though I suppose that could happen in the BWCA depending on where I go over the next decade. 6'3" 185# most of weight in legs. Lol I have a prism if you want to try it out. It is for sale. Definitely get yourself a kayak paddle. If you have some money. Spurge on a Werner ulral light bent shaft. Take care of it and it will last 40 years. Call the factory and ask for a blemished paddle.. 6'2" 220# trying unsuccessfully to lose any. Age 60. Up until 52 i could eat what i want. No longer |
||
timf1981 |
plmn: "Thanks for the great info so far, definitely has me leaning towards the Magic. sns, that Blackwater is a beauty but more than I'm willing to spend. If you've thought about selling your Magic, let me know.ISRO: " Werner makes many styles of kayak paddles. Anywhere from 50 to $700 dollars. I picked up a discounted factory blemish. I didnt get the top of the line. But close. Give them a call because they dont always get the blemished paddles listed right away. I also got the paddle with double bends where you hold it. Very comfortable and easy on the wrist. I have done 5 bwca solo trips in my 20ft 3in Wenonah mn3 . The first trip was with a $30 kayak paddle and my expensive single bent shaft carbon fiber paddle. I used the kayak paddle for the first two hours. Then switch to the expensive paddle. After thirty seconds it went straight to the bottom of the canoe. I was able to travel at 4.25 mph loaded with 95# of gear. I have convinced two youtubers to switch to kayak paddles. One other is a purist and is sticking the the single paddle. My cheap paddle could be split in half into two single paddles with handles |
||
Rainman1990 |
plmn: "Arcola: "I'd put my Greyduck Orion against either of those boats. If you'd like you can paddle mine anytime. I'm in Stillwater. I paddled a Magic next to an Orion for 5 days and the Orion outdid the magic around every corner. Great pack space much faster/more efficient, I struggled to keep up. Their Gelcoat holds up better on surprise rocks in my experience and overall beauty of a Grey Duck is higher. I would call Grey Duck and see what they have to say about it though, I agree their isn't much info out there yet. |
||
Banksiana |
timf1981:" Whatever works for you works for you. But in terms of mechanics and physics a properly paddled bent is a more efficient means of propulsion. Most folks that are quicker with a kayak paddle are faster because they paddle at a higher cadence with the kayak paddle- it's the equivalent of saying "the red bike is faster than the blue bike because I move my legs faster on the red bike". A vertical kayak stroke mimics the efficiency of blade motion that a bent provides but it is difficult to maintain a high cadence with a vertical stroke and energy is lost due to the increased distance that the blades must travel compared to the standard stroke. Then there is the considerable loss of efficiency due to the mass of the paddle. A 51.5" ZRE bent weighs 7.5oz, a Werner Cypress bent comes in at 25.5oz. If a day is 4 hours of paddling at a sedate 30 strokes/minute the total "lifted" during the course of a day: Kayak paddle = 11,475#, Bent shaft = 3,375#. I easily switch sides with scarcely any difference in stroke time. Using a j-stroke from a center seated solo is ridiculously inefficient. A j stroke is simply a rudder applied with every stroke; makes a little bit of sense from the stern (where your leverage reduces the forward motion tax), but from the center of the hull you're simply squandering your forward motion. C stroke inefficiency replicates the path of a double blade. A kayak paddle definitely can be of assistance in rough conditions. It's length and ease of applying pressure on either side really can help in high seas. |
||
plmn |
I found an older Bell Magic for sale, but there are a few spider cracks in it, the worst being a foot or so long. I didn't realize this but they used clear gelcoat instead of resin back then. No chips or peeling or apparent damage to the underlying Kevlar but I'm thinking I'd still want to fix that to prevent future issues. The gelcoat repair I did on my ski boat, well, let's just say it's a good thing it was underneath and mostly out of sight. Any thoughts? Does anything really need to be done at all so long as it isn't chipping? Other than that it appears to be in great shape for its age, much better than an outfitter rental. A used boat is pretty attractive, since I know that even if I don't like it I can still use it for the summer and sell it next year for little to no loss. But the gelcoat is giving me some pause. |
||
Arcola |
plmn: "Thanks again for the thoughts. Gelcoat protects the boat. Spider cracks are cosmetic for the most part, unless the boat really took a hit and is soft. The "anti gelcoat" thoughts are silly at best unless one is trying to save 2-3 pounds and doesn't intend to hit bottom or rocks, EVER. Buy the boat and go paddling. |
||
JD |
What I will say regarding stability is that the NW Solo is a little squirrelly with just me in it. Once you're in it, and paddling normally, it's pretty much fine, but it definitely rocks a little if you shift your weight. With an extra 80lbs of gear, food, and camera stuff, it's noticeably more stable. I think a Magic with my gear loadout would also probably feel mostly fine for me, but at your height, with no gear, especially if you raise the seat drops higher than the standard seating height, it might be on the tippy side. What you gain in speed over the NW Solo for typical tripping (I'd assume ~0.5-0.8mph), you lose in stability, maneuverability, and cargo capacity. I had no problem keeping my NW Solo around 3-3.2mph with a moderate single blade pace, and I could go faster if needed, but prefer the steady pace. As everyone says, I'd urge you to paddle them both before buying, but I think most would agree that the NW Solo is the more versatile boat. With a dog potential, I think the NW Solo is the clear front runner. If you're around the Twin Cities, I could possibly meet up with you to let you paddle mine after work on a weekday next week. |
||
JD |
|
||
plmn |
|
||
AlexanderSupertramp |
|
||
mgraber |
|
||
AlexanderSupertramp |
I really love the canoe and would still recommend it to any solo paddler, but if I could do it all again I honestly probably wouldn't get either. I feel I should have purchased the Basswood Solo (which I was also considering), simply for even more stability and space. I suspect for you a Magic or NW Solo would make you happy. The Magic is like the nimble sports coupe and the NW Solo is the sports sedan that doesn't corner as well but has a bit more room. |
||
Ryeman |
I looked at several different solo canoes before deciding on the Merlin III. I got a sweet deal, and it comes in at 28.8#: smooth, great acceleration, good tracking, and responsive turning. The stability is good, even unloaded. I am 6'1" and 220+ |
||
plmn |
AlexanderSupertramp: "Where in MN are you? If you're close to Duluth, you're welcome to paddle my NW solo, if you haven't yet been able to test one out." Thanks for the offer, but I'm clear across the state and don't get that way very often. |
||
ducks |
|
||
timf1981 |
JD: "I had a similar dilemma myself. I'm heavier than you and carry more gear, resulting in about a 300lb total payload, at 5'9" though so lower center of gravity as well. I rented a NW Solo last year and loved it. The Magic seems to be the way to go for almost everything except winding rivers/creeks, or fishing, due to the slimmer/faster hull and better tracking. I see a lot more of them for sale than NW Solos. While waiting for a decent condition NW Solo to be listed at a price I could justify for a used boat, I ended up just buying a new one in red Starlite with wood trim. I couldn't deny the beauty. I have a very nice bent shaft kayak paddle you could try out. I live right nect to Medicine lake in Plymouth. No more momentum killing energy wasting J stroke |
||
Banksiana |
|
||
timf1981 |
Banksiana: "A double blade is faster if you lack the technique to paddle a bent at a similar rate. With proper technique a bent is a more efficient means of propulsion due to a combination of factors, the most important being the paddle's path being closer to the center of the canoe, weight differential is also a significant factor. Paddlers that achieve higher speed with a double find it possible to paddle a double at a higher cadence; it's technique not the tool that determines the pace." I disagree... There is a reason why they dont allow kayak paddles into a canoe race. How efficient is a J-stroke? Even a sweep or C stroke is not efficient. You may be able to switch paddling side at lighting speed. But 99% of us cant. Kayak paddles can be stroked very vertically. Last spring i had a very difficult 45 minute paddle into the wind across open water . If i lost the bow. There was no getting it back. I would never had tried it with a single paddle |
||
WHendrix |
timf1981: "Can you add a pic of the back brace and foot brace?" This first image is of the back brace. It is from Surf to Summit. Here's the foot brace. It was installed at Northstar. Both of these are installed on the NW Solo. |
||
plmn |
I still like it, but was not expecting that. 11 pounds is enough of a difference to justify buying a new one at some point, which is good or bad, depending on if you are me or my wife. |
||
JD |
|
||
ISRO |
plmn: "Thanks for the great info so far, definitely has me leaning towards the Magic. sns, that Blackwater is a beauty but more than I'm willing to spend. If you've thought about selling your Magic, let me know.ISRO: " Pack weight to start was about 53LBS with a weeks worth of food for my Q trip last fall. I limited my travel to 8 hours a day on last falls solo trip, at that I would only single portage for the first 4-4.5 hrs then double portaged as I realized fatigue was a factor and did not need to risk an injury. Started at PP on a Thursday and paddled up the Man Chain, left on the Falls Chain, left into the McEwen Chain thru to Louisa/Agnes and out to Basswood on Sunday. There were many sections that I double portaged due to the rain and terrain. |
||
OCDave |
The Magic is a bit narrower so I see many of those paddled with double bladed paddles. Good Luck |
||
plmn |
I've seen a lot of conflicting accounts of these two canoes being described as tippy or stable and I am wondering if that has to do as much with weight, height, and seat position as it does experience. I weigh about 185 and with load less than 230, though I may end up taking my 25 pound dog with at some point so that would be 255-260 max. So within the "optimal load" of each empty and loaded. I'm 6'3" with most of my height in my legs. I've had some knee issues and have size 13 feet, so I'm almost exclusively a sitter. I prefer a relatively high seat position and will probably mostly paddle sit and switch. It seems to me stability may be a pretty important consideration if I'm by myself in the middle of nowhere, but on the other hand I've never unintentionally dumped. Yet. I plan on paddling a Magic in the next week or so from a dealer but there will be no NW Solos to try for another month. My heart says Magic for that nice glide but my brain is saying NW Solo for the stability, capacity, easy loading/unloading, and overall versatility. The Magic seems versatile for my use as well, just maybe not as much. I considered an Advantage or Wilderness but I think I'll prefer something more well-rounded. There's a lot of wind in my neck of the woods so I don't think the rather tall and long Prism would work great (though they sure are the easiest to find used). Any thoughts would be appreciated. |
||
MagicMan1 |
*Initial stability in both will feel very different than your tandem and will improve with experience. Secondary stability is equal between your choices. *Use a double blade paddle in rough waters. Having one of those blades constantly in the water will give confidence. Also, a double blade will help you keep up with the tandem paddlers regardless of the canoe. Keep a single blade in the boat for when making time is not a major concern. *if paddling with dog and gear is a frequent occurrence, go with the NW Solo |
||
sns |
I have owned both. Kept the Magic, which was/is definitely faster. Trip with me (175#) a dog (50#) and UL gear for a total weight of 255-260. You are a bit taller (I am just under 6'), and I lowered my seat below stock height, so your center of gravity would be higher. When you paddle the Magic, take packs or dry bags (add water) or whatever it takes to simulate your tripping weight. If you like it, I'd tell you to get the Magic. If you can't get used to it in a 30 minute paddle, head toward the NW solo. In full disclosure, I bought a Savage River Blackwater which is faster still, and have not tripped in the Magic for a few years. Your Glide May Vary. |
||
ISRO |
Magic w/E6 Carbon thwart and trim. Alum footbrace. I really like this boat as it is really efficient and stable. From all day travel to jigging walleyes and Lakers in Q and the BWCA it has seen a variety of uses and handled them all well. 27LBS all up I use a ZRE single and also a Bending Branches Carbon 260 kayak paddle as well. If it is windy or I just want to make time then the Yak paddle gets the nod as it is on average .5 mph faster. Single blade when Im just cruising or keeping up with my buddy in his Old Town Northern Light with his Yak paddle..............grin |
||
plmn |
ISRO: " Very nice. What size pack is that and how much does it weigh? One of the things I'm wondering about is getting it trimmed properly with one pack so I can single portage. I'm surprised a double bladed paddle is that much faster. I have a Wenonah Black Lite now but will have to consider a double blade in the future. |
||
MagicMan1 |
|
||
sns |
Here's his: More intel is good - take him up on his offer to paddle it! |
||
plmn |
ISRO: "Pack weight to start was about 53LBS with a weeks worth of food for my Q trip last fall. " That pack looks like a perfect fit. According to my measurements one of my Sealline 115s should fit if it's not full to the top, while my GG #4 has no chance unless it's sitting upright above the gunwale, which may act like a sail. I'll be bringing those and a backpack with to try so I'll find out. |
||
justpaddlin |
|
||
Banksiana |
The Magic makes almost the perfect compromises for an all around tripping solo. Decent speed, surprisingly sea worthy, comfortable to paddle. A double blade is only faster if you're better at paddling with a double. A single bent paddled from a seated position should be the most efficient means of locomotion. If you paddle faster with a double its because you paddle at a higher cadence with a double than you do with a single. From a seated position the bent (when properly wielded) will transfer more of the energy you expend into forward motion. I paddled an Advantage for most of my career and like SNS have jumped to a Savage River Blackwater late in life. |
||
Arcola |
|
||
plmn |
Arcola: "I'd put my Greyduck Orion against either of those boats. If you'd like you can paddle mine anytime. I'm in Stillwater. Thanks for the offer, there's not much info out there on Greyduck. I did consider the Orion originally, but they are at least $700 more expensive and from what I can find on their website all their finishes, including clear, appear to be gelcoats. Otherwise from the specs it looks like it may be much like the Magic at the waterline while being more open at the gunwales. An interesting design and not totally out of the question yet. |
||
Driftless |
|
||
NikonF5user |
Ryeman: " Merlin III brothers! |
||
NikonF5user |
If you are looking for speed - if you're a fitness paddler or if your preferred style is sit-n-switch with a bent-shaft paddle, then the Magic is about as good as it gets. I think it's a wonderful boat, but after paddling the Merlin I realize just how much fun you can have sneaking into creeks and narrows and inlets when you want (and crusing when you need to). Had I purchased a Magic or Cruiser I would be plenty happy, but I would also be out there getting a second boat (probably a WildFIRE or Phoenix) to explore. The NW Solo does both decently well. It really does come down to paddling style, but for tripping in the BWCA and similar places you certainly couldn't go wrong with a NW Solo (or its close relatives the Peregrine, Merlin III, and Swift Keewaydin 15). |
||
justpaddlin |
plmn: "This 2002 Bell Magic was was listed at 32 pounds from what I could find, which seemed reasonable for gelcoat compared the current 27 pound resin model. But I thought it felt a bit heavier than that. I weighed it and it is actually 38 pounds. It's all stock and has never been refinished or repaired. That is quite a disparity from what they claimed and 11 pounds or 40% heavier than what a current Northstar Magic is. That is a bit surprising with aluminum trim. In my experience Bell was optimistic (or ?) about their boat weights. On the positive side, I think that whatever adds weight is likely adding to strength and durability since other than the gelcoat (which I think Bell listed at 3-5 pounds) it can only be the fabric or the resin or the wood density of the thwarts or the thickness of the gunwales. My Merlin II is also in the high 30's I think but it's taken several full speed direct hits on rocks with only minor chips to the gelcoat plus I can treat it almost like Royalex where I ram partially sunken trees in rivers all the time to get over them while my friend that does the same thing with his Northstar Trillium has epoxy-coated his boat a couple times and added skid plates and it still has a soft area from ramming trees after 2 years of (hard) use while my boat is 25 years old with no issues. He thinks the blacklite lay-up is too light. He's also a bit disappointed in how hollow/noisy the boat sounds if you bump it with your paddle. I enjoyed the solid feel of my black/gold Bell Magic. I also prefer the interior finish on Bells vs the shiny interior with wrinkles on Northstars. For normal use (ease of use) or single portaging I'd definitely consider a lightweight Northstar Magic too, I just think there are some positives to the Bell that may offset the weight penalty vs Northstars for some folks. |
||
plmn |
justpaddlin: "plmn: "This 2002 Bell Magic was was listed at 32 pounds from what I could find, which seemed reasonable for gelcoat compared the current 27 pound resin model. But I thought it felt a bit heavier than that. I weighed it and it is actually 38 pounds. It's all stock and has never been refinished or repaired. That is quite a disparity from what they claimed and 11 pounds or 40% heavier than what a current Northstar Magic is. Yeah, that's the theory, more durability with more weight. I do plan on taking this on a river weekly and will probably only have it in the BWCA once or twice per year, so that may turn out to be a net positive. It just surprised me. If I add a foot brace and a removable portage yoke it will weigh nearly the same as my 17' tandem. Personally I think the interior finish looks kind dingy compared to my glossy tandem and will be harder to clean, but not a big deal. To each their own. |