Permit Cancelation Change

Hoarding is a big cause
How do you get overnight paddle permits into the hands of people who are going to actually use them? And how do you do that in an equitable manner?” she said.

California state parks offer one example. Effective July 1, new fees and cancellation rules increase the cost of canceling close to a reservation date, a response to “ongoing high demand for campsites and concerns about reserved sites going unused,” parks spokeswoman Jo Biswas said.

The change goes after no-shows, too. Visitors who don’t appear three times in a calendar year are banned from making reservations for a year. Repeat BWCAW offenders are contacted and urged to cancel future permits, Quinn said.

Why are cancellations in the Boundary Waters on the rise? It’s complicated
Outfitters and officials say artificial scarcity and cultural shifts are both factors. Solutions are in the works.

By Bob Timmons

The Minnesota Star Tribune
May 31, 2026 at 5:30AM

Canoeists paddle through wind and waves on Lake Insula Tuesday, May 19, in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. (Anthony Souffle/The Minnesota Star Tribune)

While the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness is considered a trip of a lifetime, recent data suggests planning a visit to the northern Minnesota destination is its own adventure.

This spring, wilderness managers reported that in 2025 more permits went unused than ever during the high-visitation quota season from May through September.

Cancellations hit a record 12,000-plus, the U.S. Forest Service reported, citing “excessive reservations.” No-shows increased from 2024, too.

The hoarding can complicate trip planning, leading would-be visitors to scramble for permits when reservations open and then repeatedly check for coveted spots that become available through cancellations.

There are a number of factors driving the behavior, according to close observers. The Forest Service, several outfitters and others on the front lines have theories, both similar and distinct. Among them: a reservation system that enables excessive demand; a public, in general, prone to hyper-scheduling; and perhaps more relaxed attitudes today about wilderness travel.

The Forest Service is considering changes to the permitting and reservation structure that it expects to recommend this year. Adjustments, such as trying to lower the number of short-notice cancellations, could mean fewer permits go unused while also deterring no-shows.

“The overarching thing for me is a perceived scarcity [of permits],” said Clare Shirley, who with her husband, Dan, runs Sawbill Canoe Outfitters, north of Tofte.

The Boundary Waters averages about 150,000 visitors annually. Visitation spiked in 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic, with more than 166,000. That year, there was an uptick in reports of reckless behavior, littering and campsite damage. The Forest Service responded by reducing the number of permits available for entry in 2022.



The combination of new paddlers introduced to the BWCA during the pandemic and a reduction in entries contributed to a perception that permits are hard to come by, Shirley said.

That placed even more pressure on an annual booking process that opens to the public on a morning in late January. It has become a race: Permits don’t sell out, but high-demand dates and entry points are quickly nabbed online through a federal lands reservation website, recreation.gov. People also can call to reserve or work with an outfitter.

Shirley said many people are booking multiple possible dates — and later canceling the ones they don’t use — because registration opens before other summer obligations have sorted out.

“They don’t know their kids’ baseball schedules,” she said. “You know, that’s understandable. I’m not saying that is bad behavior. I get why you do it.”

The behavior isn’t exclusive to the wilderness but rather a cultural shift across other activities, she added. “People are just more used to this being an issue in all corners of their life.”

Shirley and Jason Zabokrtsky, who runs Ely Outfitting Co. in Ely, said rising cancellations also are driven by visitors who scrap their permits when a better one comes along. Newly available permits show up on recreation.gov within 24 hours of a cancellation.



“Canceled permits can spur more cancellations as people trade up and cancel a less desirable permit,” Zabokrtsky said.

“We see that happen commonly, especially when we have a group at the shop getting outfitted, and we tell them about a different permit option.”

That scenario is encouraging but does not represent many of the cancellations. Visitors still are reserving more than they intend to use, said Cathy Quinn, the Forest Service’s assistant wilderness manager. Nearly 4,000 were canceled within four days of the entry date, limiting the likelihood another visitor will pick it up, she added.

Dave Seaton of Hungry Jack Outfitters off the Gunflint Trail out of Grand Marais said he thinks social changes are at play, too. Access to the BWCAW, broadly, is held in more casual regard by some of his younger customers than it is by older generations. Plus, he said, the public is more risk-averse.

“There are a lot of people using the Boundary Waters like a campground, not a wilderness adventure. That’s a change in society,” he said. “Many people are looking to relax and chill rather than have an adventure.”

Seaton said a demand for wilderness adventure still exists — the visitors seeking those opportunities are just aiming for prime times and specific places that quickly become scarce in the current reservation paradigm.



“Every [baby] boomer who has ever held a canoe paddle in Minnesota still goes to the Boundary Waters, and at least 50 percent of kids who went to camps [like Menogyn, Widgiwagan and Northern Tier] still want to go to the wilderness,” he said. “And now, so does everybody else. It’s a mixed blessing on several fronts.”

‘Need to change’
Possible solutions appear as mixed as the possible culprits.

Shirley is a member of a public work group in talks with the Forest Service about a potential fix. The team, made up of stakeholders like area outfitters and other business people, along with conservation groups and government representatives, is part of a larger collaborative.

Created by the Forest Service, the group connects with the agency on the management of the Superior National Forest, which contains the million-acre BWCAW. And, in the case of Shirley and the work group, offers recommendations.

A staggered rollout of reservations is one possibility, Shirley said.

Many on social media and internet forums favor another solution: Higher permit fees or stiffer penalties.



Currently, it costs $6 to make a reservation. In addition, entry permits cost $16 per adult and $8 for a child 17 and younger.

Permit-holders who cancel at least two days before their entry are refunded the permit cost. Those who cancel within a day of their entry are charged $32 as a penalty. The $6 reservation fee is nonrefundable. No-shows forfeit all payments.

However, the Forest Service, and even some outfitters, say it’s not so easy to find an optimal cost. Increasing the fees risks making the wilderness less accessible to lower-income visitors.

Shirley said mitigating that risk is an “overarching goal.”

“How do you get overnight paddle permits into the hands of people who are going to actually use them? And how do you do that in an equitable manner?” she said.

California state parks offer one example. Effective July 1, new fees and cancellation rules increase the cost of canceling close to a reservation date, a response to “ongoing high demand for campsites and concerns about reserved sites going unused,” parks spokeswoman Jo Biswas said.


The change goes after no-shows, too. Visitors who don’t appear three times in a calendar year are banned from making reservations for a year. Repeat BWCAW offenders are contacted and urged to cancel future permits, Quinn said.

Whatever is decided in Minnesota, an emphasis on educating the public clearly about the cascading effects of hoarding permits or skipping outright is paramount, Shirley said.

A collaborative-inspired proposal that includes a new cancellation policy is in the works and could get shared with the public for its feedback “in the coming months,” Quinn said.

“Something needs to change,” Shirley added. “I’m not particularly married to one solution or the other. I think it’ll need to be a constellation of things. And, certainly ripe for public input.”



Share

Comment
about the writer
about the writer
Bob Timmons

Paddled down from Beartrap lake Friday stayed on Fairy that same night paddled out yesterday... Gull, Gun,Fairy, Boot and fourtown only say one camp in use on Fourtown by the Boot portage. passed a solo guy going in betwwen mudro and fourtown

I really like the rolling reservations. It’s what QUetico does and seems to work. It’s really hard to plan vacations out 8-9 months in advance. Would be better for everyone.

About a quarter of all cancels were 4 days or less notice. They have to address that! There isn’t any industry that gives a full refund now away days with such a small notice. Of course some are legit, stuff happens, but 4,000 of them in a year…I got a bridge in Brooklyn for ya if ya believe that :).

I am happy they are trying to address it but I don’t think it will be enough. People are selfish and suck when they are on the internet booking. They just don’t think how their actions affects others.

Need a higher initial cost: I think that was already proposed for 2027? This article didn’t really address that?

Need a rolling refund: The later the cancellation, the less you get back. Still incentivize cancelling over no show, but incentivize cancelling earlier rather than later. Quetico does this and it seems to work.

The no shows? Higher initial fees might help? I like the idea California State Parks did rolling refunds and banning after 3 no shows. Although I’d do 2-3 no shows in a lifetime not a calendar year. That also incentivizes cancelling over no shows.

T

podgeo: "Paddled down from Beartrap lake Friday stayed on Fairy that same night paddled out yesterday... Gull, Gun,Fairy, Boot and fourtown only say one camp in use on Fourtown by the Boot portage. passed a solo guy going in betwwen mudro and fourtown "

Like everything people are getting more selfish and don't think about others whom would like the opportunity to go to the BWCA. Think of your affect on others please.

Also a cancellation way ahead of time is understandable so often something comes up.
No shows the penalty should double amount at least. Also most whom cancel know well ahead of time if they are going to cancel but wait to 72 hours. If you have to cancel, cancel 7 days before or penalty will increase on a sliding scale.

Snip......social changes are at play, too. Access to the BWCAW, broadly, is held in more casual regard by some of his younger customers than it is by older generations. Plus,
There are a lot of people using the Boundary Waters like a campground, not a wilderness adventure.....

From this article, I have said in the past that the privilege of possessing a permit is not the same now as it was 20 years ago. People do not respect a permit and it shows with the current problem we have.

We have talked about this issue many times on the forum and the two sides usually can't find a middle ground. We are always worried about upsetting a certain demographic, burdening campers with fees or penalties, or not being inclusive to all people.

After reading the article, how about they make it so possessing a permit is once again a privilege and not using the permit has consequences that make it unfavorable to treat the permit like free pass. Myself, I've had it with the way people are taking this.

I'm pretty much done with all the softball or baby glove reasons people can't use their permit.

Tom

timatkn: "I really like the rolling reservations. It’s what QUetico does and seems to work. It’s really hard to plan vacations out 8-9 months in advance. Would be better for everyone."

I agree. I think rolling reservations would also reduce hoarding since people can’t reserve a bunch of dates in one sitting but need to make reservations on different days as the dates they want become available.

EmmaMorgan: "

timatkn: "I really like the rolling reservations. It’s what QUetico does and seems to work. It’s really hard to plan vacations out 8-9 months in advance. Would be better for everyone."

I agree. I think rolling reservations would also reduce hoarding since people can’t reserve a bunch of dates in one sitting but need to make reservations on different days as the dates they want become available. "

I don’t reserve MN state park sites because I hate the rolling reservation system so much. And it has its own issues. I much prefer a system by which no-shows or late cancellations are charged a fee. Plus, the media needs to stop feeding into the panic of opening day…reassure people that plenty of permits become available as the season progresses.

I don’t care if people “trade up” as different permits become available but no-shows are inexcusable.

I think some people take a lot of permits early just because it makes them feel good possessing them.

Pinetree: "
Like everything people are getting more selfish and don't think about others whom would like the opportunity to go to the BWCA. Think of your affect on others please.
"

The Tragedy of the Commons! Like so many problems affecting us today

So right now, a soloist on an overnight trip is incentivized simply to no-show rather than cancel 1 day before the permit. The difference in cost is a loss of $22 (16 + 6) versus the $32 penalty. Have I got that right?

LaVirginienne: "So right now, a soloist on an overnight trip is incentivized simply to no-show rather than cancel 1 day before the permit. The difference in cost is a loss of $22 (16 + 6) versus the $32 penalty. Have I got that right? "

No, I believe you have to show up to get the refund of the extra $16 you’re charged as a soloist when you reserve your permit. Remember that when you reserve for a party of 1 you pay $38 ($16 user fee + $16 “user fee deposit” + $6). The Forest Service issues you a $16 refund when you pick up your permit. If you no-show or cancel the day before you lose the full $32 that you paid, plus the $6 reservation fee.

A couple of years ago I traded a May 1 permit for a different May 1 permit on the evening of April 30 due to a wind forecast. I forfeited the whole $38 that I paid for the original permit.

I do not want fees to increase for original purchase. I am fine with penalties for late cancelations. There should be a window (14 days? 21? 28?) where you can cancel or exchange for minimal charge.

Not sure how I feel about rolling reservations - I'm open to considering it I guess.

I didn't think about people with baseball schedules, lol. I only know people who plan their summer AROUND their permit - ha. That said, I cannot plan that far in advance, so I DO NOT buy a permit that far in advance. I take my chances and go with what is available when I am ready to commit.

Permit hoarding

Bots at 8 am: how the permit race is being automated
A web developer known as Jack wanted to test a suspicion that had spread widely among outdoor enthusiasts: that automated scripts were outrunning human users at the moment permits dropped. So he built his own bots and ran an experiment.

When cancellation permits were released at 8 am, Jack’s scripts swept through multiple Recreation.gov pages simultaneously. Within seconds, they had secured permits for the Main Salmon, the San Juan River, and — twice — the Middle Fork of the Salmon. His human control, a friend clicking manually with full knowledge of the release schedule, was shut out entirely.

Using a standard browser inspection tool, Jack found that upcoming permit release dates were visible in the site’s data before they went live. “If you were a web developer of any kind,” he said, “you would be able to find it.” Scraperbot code is shared openly on outdoor forums. Podcast host Sam Carter built a bot to demonstrate how easy it was to game the system and found people messaging him to brag about their own tools — some costing thousands of dollars to build.

Reserved but empty: the gap between digital demand and real use
The cruelest irony of the current system is not the competition. It is what happens after it ends. Sites secured through Recreation.gov routinely go unused, and rangers across multiple public lands report seeing the pattern repeat season after season.

On the Gates of Lodore stretch of the Green River — a permitted section of Dinosaur National Monument where odds of securing a launch are around 2 percent — one group arrived to find the boat ramp completely deserted. Three private groups are allowed to launch daily. That day, they were the only ones there.

Rangers are largely powerless to respond. They cannot reassign a no-show site until after the first night has passed. One ranger described the effect plainly: “We’re basically just blocking an email address.” The wilderness is not overrun. It is sitting quiet while the website is in chaos.

The equity problem hiding in plain sight
The competition for permits is not a level race. Research by University of Montana professor Will Rice found that advance reservations through Recreation.gov disproportionately go to users from higher-income zip codes, while walk-in campers tend to come from lower-income areas.

The barriers stack up in ways that are not always obvious: reliable high-speed internet, familiarity with the system, flexible scheduling. If you work shifts, guaranteeing you are online at 8 am on a specific date months out may simply not be possible. University of Colorado economist Jonathan Hughes confirmed that the current system benefits higher-income users and makes it structurally harder for rangers to address no-shows.

Policy alternatives exist. The Grand Canyon has run its own weighted lottery since 2006, separate from Recreation.gov, where odds improve over time for repeat applicants — and it has operated for nearly two decades without significant controversy.

The institutional capacity to act is diminished. DOGE-related staffing cuts have left Recreation.gov without a program manager on the government side. Sheri Hughes, who helped build the original system and retired in 2021, was direct: “I handed them a perfectly running system. And it’s just a shit show now.”

Recreation.gov is the mechanism through which millions of Americans interact with land that belongs to all of them. When that mechanism tilts toward those with the most resources and fastest connections, the promise that public land is genuinely public starts to look more like a slogan than a guarantee.

I have small chance for a trip this weekend, so I thought I'd check out permits. Came across this and just had to share it.

East Bearskin sells out in January, for the entire summer, every year. But today... Just look at the picture.

This is why I preach to people not to worry about their permits until they're driving up. A good permit will become available within a few days of the date.

Someone is enjoying a quiet week out of E Bearskin right now,and 3 or 4 other groups are sitting at home or going somewhere else. There is NO REASON for 4 highly sought after permits to be available like this unless someone is INTENTIONALLY hoarding them to keep others out this week. I don't see any other logical reasons.

Z4K: "This is why I preach to people not to worry about their permits until they're driving up. A good permit will become available within a few days of the date. "

Glad that works for you but most people need to have firm plans well in advance of a trip. Permits canceled a couple days before the date have a very low chance of being booked because most groups have people that need their PTO submitted weeks or months in advance.

Also, I get notifications for Sawbill cancelations, due to a trip I was planning, and I've been seeing a higher number than usual of cancelations for the upcoming week. I think it is due to the fire ban. I would not take cancelations in a fire ban as the norm.

I just don't understand. I used to go with a group that always went somewhere different but always entered on the Monday after the 4th of July. Same canoes, same tents, same meals, same people, same PTO, regardless of where we were going. Most of us had to book our PTO before permits even went on sale. You know what we did? We went to the BWCA on the Monday after the 4th of July.

And then they overhauled the permit system! In response, we went to the BWCA on the Monday after the 4th of July.

If we were still doing this trip and wanted to book our permit today, there are currently permits available at 24 entry points for that day. If we wait though, more will appear in the next two weeks, I PROMISE.

*EDIT this strategy does not apply to memorial day and labor day. If you must vacation when most of the rest of the country is also vacationing, good luck.

I got a permit the day they went on sale for entry on May29. Then my partner remembered that he had to be at his son's graduation on June 1. So we had to cancel and get one for June 4 at a different EP, because the original EP was sold out. It was months before our entry date, so I'm sure someone used our original permit. But it was a bit frustrating. Obviously, there are legitimate reasons for cancelling. But I completely agree that something needs to be done. It will be interesting to see what that something turns out to be.

I have already canceled 3 permits this year.

The 1st because I arrived a day earlier than expected, and my entry permit was available on that day. Saved me a bunkhouse fee, and I got an extra day in the BW. But I canceled my original reservation for the next day less than 24 hour notice - no refund.

For my trip July 6, I've changed my mind twice about where to enter. Two more cancelations. Who knows if I'll change my mind again?!

In a typical year, I will usually cancel 1 reservation with either a date change or a location change over 2 to 3 trips. 3 is unusual.

It's tough out there. The last Wednesday in January is a long way away from any hard dates for school, work obligations etc.

I have been guilty of hitting rec.gov and rapid booking a few dates to present to my groups for consent. Once I get my answers, I cancel the extras.

That 9am free-for-all creates a sense of urgency. As fast as the prime entry points are claimed, you feel like you have to grab as many as you can. There are easy solutions.

1) Force users to complete the payment process for each reservation before reserving a second reservation. The only time I waste on registration day is adding an alternate leader because you can't amend that later. Everything else you can. So each reservation I book, I add to the cart as fast as i can because I have 15 minutes to complete the transaction (and I think that resets with each reservation you add). So the fastest you can go is overnight paddle, one person, one canoe, not going to Canada, pick any ranger station, add to my cart and move on to the next 15 minutes. Make each person complete the whole transaction before adding another date, slows down the frenzy.
1a) Make a rule that you can only add 2 people more than your original reservation. I just do me and the alternate to start, then after claiming my dates, I go back and fill in all the right information.
1b) don't allow changing the ranger station or issuing location. The only things you can't change are the leader and the alternate. Everything else fungible.

These changes would slow the rec.gov down and force us to make hard plans out of soft ones before we log in.

2) Everything about these trips is expensive except for the registrations. Make a $250 deposit for each reservation. There about 250 calendar days between the last Wednesday in January and Sept 30. Dollar a day cancellation fee seems fair. Four reservations costs me a $100 one way, $1000 the other way. If it takes my group 30 days to figure out which date is the one, that is $90. With my young adults, I would be in the $360 cancellation range.

foxfireniner: "2) Everything about these trips is expensive except for the registrations. Make a $250 deposit for each reservation. There about 250 calendar days between the last Wednesday in January and Sept 30. Dollar a day cancellation fee seems fair. Four reservations costs me a $100 one way, $1000 the other way. If it takes my group 30 days to figure out which date is the one, that is $90. With my young adults, I would be in the $360 cancellation range. "

Having a deposit of that size would price out a significant number of people. Even if that money is refunded when the permit is used, $250 is a sizeable amount for many folks who live paycheck to paycheck. Do we really want to keep them out just because of the actions of a few miscreants?

All things considered, a BW trip is still fairly economical compared to many vacations, and as such more attainable for those of modest means. I'd hate to see it go the way of big game hunting out west, which has gotten so insanely expensive that it's hard to justify the cost. That's just one example.

I'm not saying prices don't need to be raised, but let's be reasonable about it.