| Author |
Message Text |
|
mgraber
|
Had a 2010 17 ft Penobscot listed at 65lb ,ended up being 67 lb. I think some people get the non Royalex Penobscot confused with the Royalex model. HUGE difference.
|
|
deerfoot
|
mgraber: "Had a 2010 17 ft Penobscot listed at 65lb ,ended up being 67 lb. I think some people get the non Royalex Penobscot confused with the Royalex model. HUGE difference."
I have a 2013 Penobscot 17 RX which is 67/68#.
|
|
mgraber
|
deerfoot: "mgraber: "Had a 2010 17 ft Penobscot listed at 65lb ,ended up being 67 lb. I think some people get the non Royalex Penobscot confused with the Royalex model. HUGE difference."
I have a 2013 Penobscot 17 RX which is 67/68#."
So, about the same. And so as not to confuse anyone, mine was also an RX or Royalex model, as I should have stated.
|
|
blackdawg9
|
my 16 footer, is about a 2008 model. i believe at the time, they said they weighed in at 88 pounds. that thing is that heavy or heavier.
|
|
MoosePaddle
|
I’m looking at a used 1998 17’ Penobscot in Royalex. The owner says it’s 75 lbs. I know the “newer” Royalex Penobscot 17s were 65 lbs. Does anyone know if that changed at some point or if the owner could be wrong? Thanks!
|
|
PikeEatPike
|
We have a 17' Penobscot, 2004 ish. 68lbs. Nothing in it. 
|
|
Driftless
|
Old Town seemed to be always be low on their stated weights. I have two Penobscots that both weight 10 lbs heavier than they "should." I think others have reported agreement with Old Town. If the seller actually weighed it, I would tend to believe that more than Old Town.
|