Boundary Waters Quetico Forum :: Trip Planning Forum :: Map preferences and why?
|
Author | Message Text | ||
Alex1985 |
|
||
BearBurrito |
|
||
BigCurrent |
|
||
Fecker |
|
||
Jackfish |
Fecker: "...I feel the Voyager Maps have more to offer and are easier to read when out paddling. They have been a little harder to come by but worth grabbing." They're not harder to come by anymore. They're available for purchase right here on BWCA.com. Buying your maps here also helps support the website. |
||
paddlinjoe |
cyclones30: "Yeah, or you could always pack one of the National Geographic (east or west) maps as those still do a decent job and do show basically half the park on each one. If you wanted a backup that still showed campsites and portages but wider view. I like the Voyageur maps because there is a map of the entire area on the back. But if I can only take one set, it is a Fisher for long term sentimental reasons. Typically I bring both Fisher and Voyageur. |
||
boonie |
|
||
Duckman |
|
||
MikeinMpls |
Mike |
||
mgraber |
The back-up for Quetico would be the Chrismar map of the entire area. More accurate than any other map available, but features are even smaller. I prefer the more compact Fishers for my main maps. Too many maps with McKenzie and plenty of mistakes. Voyagers are huge to me. In order of detail size most to least: Mckenzie-25*28, 2 inch per mile (very large detail) Voyager-28.75*38.75, 1.5 inch per mile (largest area per map, no Quetico maps) Fisher-22.5*28.5, 1.5 inch per mile (same size detail as Voyager, but smaller map) Nat Geo East or West - Front and back of standard foldable map. 1.1 inch per mile Chrismar (Quetico) - one side of standard foldable map 1 inch per 2 miles (this one is getting pretty small to navigate by, but is highly accurate compared to all the others) |
||
Alex1985 |
Also, I have used Fisher and Mckenzie maps in that past, but I was wondering if there were any brands other brands worth considering. I have not used Voyageur's maps yet. Thanks & and Happy Planning! |
||
cyclones30 |
I really like Voyageur...you'd need 5 and 6. (can be bought from the site store here, otherwise they can be hard to find) True north is another brand, they're soft fabric...some like those now too. Wear it, stuff it in your pocket. Oh yeah, don't be afraid to register! |
||
cyclones30 |
Anyway, to the OP I don't think you'll do that trip on one map no matter the brand. And that's a good thing...think of it as a badge of honor. And the longer and better your tripping the more maps you'll need per trip. A 4 map trip would be a dandy. |
||
Ausable |
#8 – Knife, Kekekabic #9 – Snowbank, Basswood #26 – This Man, Cache The National Geographic map for the East BWCA includes everything from Knife eastward, but it does not include Moose, Sucker, Birch, Carp, etc. For those lakes to the west of Knife, you'll need the NG West BWCA map. |
||
bhouse46 |
|
||
straighthairedcurly |
In my family, we carry a lot of maps because everyone is a control freak and wants to have their own set...lol. My son loves Fisher, my husband like McKenzie or True North, and I discovered Voyager maps last summer and am now a huge fan because I can read a Voyager map with my contact lenses in and no reading glasses. Most other maps force me to use reading glasses, partly due to scale and partly due to color contrast. With this route, you will need more than one map unless it is very small scale. |
||
schweady |
|