|
||||
 Boundary Waters Quetico Forum Trip Planning Forum s Reply
|
| Previous Messages: | |
| Author | Message Text |
| Pinetree |
08/06/2017 09:57PMquote Laketrout58: "We have seen motor boats on mountain. Marc" Same here,but I think the most was like 2 boats I seen. They did stay on the Canadian side as they suppose to. |
| jwartman59 |
08/05/2017 10:48AM yes on all. these are big beautiful lakes, to avoid them because of a few fisherman would a mistake. you'll see more motor boats in wabakimi and wcpp. |
| Laketrout58 |
08/04/2017 04:31PM |
| Laketrout58 |
08/04/2017 04:31PM We have seen motor boats on mountain. Marc |
| billconner |
08/04/2017 03:20PM When I look at maps, which could be wrong, I conclude that all for are half in US and half in CA. The US half of Mountain and Moose and a little corner of North Fowl are in BWCAW. The US half of North and South Fowl are shown as motorized areas with a 10HP limit, different from Basswood, (the other) Moose, and Snowbank for instance with a 25HP limit. I called the La Verendyre phone - which is the Quetico phone - but no one in. Then I found Provincial Parks from which I conclude you can have motors on the CA side of North and South Fowl. (Not in all of La Verendyre though.) |
| butthead |
08/04/2017 12:11PM They are in the La Verendrye Provincial Park, not Quetico. I believe motor boats are allowed in those Canadian waters. butthead |
| bposteve |
08/04/2017 10:51AM North and South Fowl yes, not sure about the others. |
| AmarilloJim |
08/04/2017 10:30AM Arte there any motor boats on Mountain, Moose, North or South Fowl? |
Community Links
Search BWCA.com
Donate Featured Sponsor
